Stalin had consolidated his power of the Soviet Union by the end 1927. He made the decision to move immediately to industrialization with the five-year plan after consolidating his leadership. Pertinently, the plan was to commence by 1928. The plan entails collecting gradually soviet agricultural sector voluntarily, however Stalin decided to force the farmers to begin collecting by the beginning of the plan. In the wake of this situation, there was a brief retreat by the farmers from coercion. The resistance of the peasants to coercion, it led to the destruction of the spring’s cultivation. Despite the background of the violence it is lucky to be aware of the push for industrialization. It is important to remember that in his speech to the business executive It is evident that Stalin wanted Russia to develop rapidly because of the following motives concerns for foreign and domestic concern and further , he also mentioned internationalism of the proletariat and Russian nationalism as key elements. Furthermore, Stalin wanted Russia to expand first due to being able to avoid the socialists of the homeland to remain unbeaten and again to not lose its independence. The plans further put forward by Stalin to Russia were to create a nation that was industrialized. Industrialization was urgent because Russia was far behind in development as compared to advanced countries.
In both documents there is evidence of militarization of political thought. Because Stalin was an administrator, he relied on his power to decide what he believed is beneficial to the Russian natives. He encouraged peasants who were initially in a voluntary mode, to begin collecting soviet agricultural products. Then, he used force to violate the original agreement. This is one of the signs of militarization which is apparent in both of the documents. He adopted a strict method of addressing his people. For instance when he stated that if the nation was not industrialized, they will be beaten and enslaved.
As per Lenin and Stalin in their two documents that they require their people to be in a relationship of submissiveness to the government (Stalin, 45). They ask that they be more arduous in comparison to wartime. With the submissiveness of the peasant, they will reach the point they’re required to be faster. The attitude of submission and hard work will allow the nation to industrialize more quickly. They wanted a partnership of submission and hard work with the government.
It is crucial to note that Lenin as well as Stalin shared a similar personality as per the passage. Both were nationalists as well as revolutionaries; this is evident in the manner that they addressed their people and their plans of electrification and industrialization they had. It is important to remember that they succeeded in inspire their people to defend their country against war that is a sign of nationalists. They decided to unify their people and devise a plan to develop the country later. This is another evidence of a revolutionary. Thus, with the above evidence it is clear that both were nationalists and revolutionists as well.
In the final analysis, it’s worth to note that the essay talks about the Russian industrialization. Lenin as well as Stalin were the two leaders who helped Russians industrialize. This essay examines two documents to illustrate the previous points.
Stalin, Jewsbury. Stalin calls for rapid Industrialization within the USSR London: print. 1930
Stalin, Jewsbury. Lawrence and Wishart. Lenin Calls for Electrification of All Russia. London 1955. Reprinted with permission.